標題: a Wiki 20 [打印本頁] 作者: dlhmznng 時間: 2016-2-25 21:06 標題: a Wiki 20
Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Rss feeds Internet Site for Medical Ghd Hair Curler Issues
To evaluate the iterative strategy of a collaborative public database (a Wiki) as a reference pertaining to information on hand illnesses many of us tested the null hypothesis that the number and type of edits are comparable for web sites covering different topics. The story of 4 hand surgery associated web pages on the English language Wikipedia (Trigger finger, Complex Native Pain Syndrome (CRPS), Ganglion cyst, plus de Quervain Syndrome) were studied from inception to Come early july 2011. Each edit had been classified as one of six styles: an addition is an revise that adds material; a erasure removes material; a modification is a combination of addition and erasure, or any rearrangement; a minor alter is a correction of spelling, grammar, or formatting glitches; vandalism is any revise that is intended to harm your page; a vandalism resolved is an edit that handles harm. The edits were being also rated as maybe controversial or not (defined as changes that present information having a clear bias or never list reliable sources). For the Ganglion cyst and Trigger Little finger pages, readability was tested at 1year increments. Our major null hypothesis was that the quantity of constructive edits (inclusion, deletion or modification) didn't differ between the 4 web pages. The percentage of constructive modifications (additions, deletions, and modifications) ended up being significantly different for each site: 121/234 (52%) for de Quervain, 258/448 (58%) for CRPS, 103/156 (66%) with regard to Trigger Finger, and 160/389 (41%) to get Ganglion cyst. The percentage of edits related to vandalism was also tremendously different: 28/234 (12%) for de Quervain, 33/156 (7%) intended for CRPS, 21/156 (14%) for Trigger Finger, and 135/389 (35%) for Ganglion cyst. Vandalism was quickly identified and resolved. Twenty six percent of all modifications were classified as potentially contentious. Forty percent of possibly questionable edits were deletions. The topic of a new Wiki web page for facts about hand illness influences the degree to which edits are beneficial. A Wiki for side illness could be a very useful resource for patients with hand ailment, but it requires careful simply because only about half the modifications are constructive. Cohort Study.
